Number of animals killed in the world by the meat, dairy and egg industries, since you opened this webpage. This does not include the billions of fish and other aquatic animals killed annually.

Based on 2007 statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' Global Livestock Production and Health Atlas.

Get this counter

RSS Feed

We Are Omnivores

A Buffet of Fruits and Vegetables

Plants provide all of the protein we need. To state we need only animal flesh for our amino acids is akin to stating we need kiwi, and not oranges, for vitamin C.

One way people casually dismiss suggestions to drop meat from their diet is by hoisting up the fancy word omnivore.  “But we’re omnivores,” they state with a hefty, steak-sauce covered dollop of pride.  “We must eat these animals.  That’s what omnivores do.”  It sounds very scientific, doesn’t it?

Omnivore does not mean “must eat meat” any more than it means “must eat cockroaches.”  It is laughable (to us, certainly not to the cows and chickens) to suggest that omnivores, who by definition can eat nearly anything, must eat one particular thing: flesh.

Being omnivores, we’re highly adaptive.  It means we can obtain nutrients from both plants and animals.  It does not mean that we’re enslaved to a particular type of fruit or creature for nutrition.

Because we can does not mean we must.

Plants provide all of the protein we need.  To state we need only animal flesh for our amino acids is akin to stating we need kiwi, and not oranges, for vitamin C.

Our status as omnivores, in fact, is exactly the perfect argument in favor of a plant-based diet.  We have a buffet of food choices.  To restrict our intake to one particular item, flesh, when more affordable, compassionate alternatives exist, is blind, wasteful and cruel.  To pretend that the buffet does not even exist, that we are trapped into eating but one source of protein, is not just incorrect, it is insane.

One Response

  1. Rachael says:

    I totally agree with all of this. I also happen to think though that even if in an ideal world, we could rear animals to have happy, pain free lives and eating meat would be better for us than refraining from it, it still doesn’t change the fact that in our world right now eating the meat produced by factory farms has to, HAS TO be far more harmful than refraining from it.
    I don’t care if it IS some magical super-protein enriched food, all the chemicals and foeces it encounters is surely enough to cancel any of the benefits out. And for the sake of argument, if it turned out that eating well reared, non chemically enhanced meat as an omnivore turned out to be healthier than being vegan, that wouldn’t make me an omnivore. Because I’d rather be slightly unhealthier, and not support the torture and death of millions of animals. (And recent studies have indicated vegans are generally healthier anyways).

    THATS why the “its natural” argument annoys me. So what if its natural?

    Sorry I realise I just ranted incoherently, but you know what its like. Good article (y)

Leave a Reply